Ever wondered how developers find security problems before an app is launched? That is where Static Application Security Testing (SAST) comes in. SAST checks the app code while it is still being built. Instead of waiting for problems to appear later, it catches them early. This makes fixing them easier, faster and cheaper. By using SAST, developers can build apps that are safer and more reliable before they go live. In this blog, we will explain what SAST is, how it works and why it matters for anyone building secure software.
What is Static Application Security Testing (SAST)?
Static Application Security Testing or SAST, is a method used to check the security of an application’s source code, bytecode or binaries without running the program. It scans the code to find weak spots, such as bugs or security flaws, early in the software development process.
Think of it like proofreading your code before it’s published. Instead of waiting for a hacker to find a mistake after launch, SAST helps developers spot issues during coding itself.
Why is SAST Important?
SAST is important because it helps developers find and fix problems early, which saves time, money and effort. Catching a vulnerability after an app is released can be expensive and damaging, not just financially but also to your company’s reputation.
With the rise in data breaches, secure coding is required. SAST gives development teams the chance to build security right into the code, instead of adding it later as an afterthought.
How SAST Actually Works
SAST tools work by scanning the code statically, which means without running it. They go through the codebase line by line, checking for known patterns that may lead to vulnerabilities like SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), hardcoded passwords or buffer overflows. Here’s how the process usually works:
- The code is written by the development team.
- The SAST tool reviews the source code or compiled code.
- It looks for risky functions, poor coding practices or areas where user input is not handled safely.
- It creates a report, listing potential issues along with the file, line number and suggestions to fix them.
Most modern SAST tools can be integrated into continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, allowing these checks to happen automatically whenever new code is added.
Top Benefits of Implementing SAST
Implementing Static Application Security Testing (SAST) offers several real-world benefits for development and security teams. In below image we can see why more companies are choosing to use it as part of their secure software development process:

1. Finds Issues Early in Development – SAST helps catch security problems at the coding stage before the app is even run. This early detection means developers can fix issues when it’s easier, cheaper and faster to do so.
2. Saves Time and Reduces Costs – Fixing bugs after an app is deployed can be time-consuming and expensive. With SAST, you can address problems as they appear in the code, which cuts down on rework and long testing cycles.
3. Improves Code Quality – Many SAST tools also highlight bad coding practices and help developers write cleaner, more maintainable code. Better code means fewer future issues and easier teamwork.
4. Supports Compliance Requirements – SAST helps organizations meet industry standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, ISO 27001 and others. It gives security teams a way to track and prove that the code meets compliance rules.
5. Boosts Developer Awareness – With SAST integrated into the development environment, developers get real-time feedback. Over time, this improves their understanding of secure coding practices and helps them avoid making the same mistakes.
6. Fits Into DevOps and CI/CD Pipelines – Modern SAST tools can be plugged into CI/CD systems. This means code can be scanned automatically whenever changes are made, keeping security checks fast and consistent.
What are the Use Cases of SAST
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is not just about benefits, it also about where and how you use it. Below are practical, real-world situations where SAST proves to be an essential tool:
- Continuous Integration Pipelines
In DevOps workflows, SAST is integrated into CI/CD pipelines to automatically scan code with every update. This enables ongoing security checks throughout development. - Enterprise-Scale Applications
For large systems with millions of lines of code, SAST helps ensure consistent security practices and detects hidden flaws across distributed teams. - Third-Party Code Audits
When using open-source libraries or external code, SAST helps verify that these components are free from known security risks before integration. - Secure Web and Mobile App Development
SAST protects mobile and web apps by scanning their codebases for threats like injection attacks, hardcoded credentials and other common flaws. - Agile Development Environments
In fast-paced Agile cycles, SAST supports continuous feedback without disrupting the sprint, making it easier to catch and fix issues early.
How is SAST Different from DAST
Understanding these differences can help teams choose the right approach for their security needs. Below are the key differences between them:
| SAST (Static Application Security Testing) | DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing) |
| Performed in the early stages of development, usually during coding | Conducted in the later stages, on running or deployed applications |
| Requires access to the application’s source code, bytecode or binaries | Does not need access to source code, it tests the app externally like a user or attacker |
| Analyzes code without executing it, identifying flaws in the structure or logic | Tests the application during runtime to uncover issues that only appear when the app is active |
| Detects coding issues such as SQL injections, hardcoded credentials, buffer overflows and unsafe functions | Identifies runtime vulnerabilities like misconfigurations, broken authentication and security headers |
| Provides fast, real-time feedback and can be integrated into IDEs or CI/CD pipelines | Feedback is slower as it requires the app to be running in a test or staging environment |
| Ideal for developers to fix security issues while writing code and for adopting a shift-left security approach | Ideal for testers to simulate real-world attacks and evaluate how the app performs under hostile conditions |
SAST or DAST Which One Should You Choose and When
When it comes to keeping your applications secure, both SAST (Static Application Security Testing) and DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing) play important roles. But a common question that pops up is “Which one should I use and when?” The answer depends on your project stage and your goals.
When to Use SAST
SAST is like proofreading your code before anyone sees the final version. It scans your application’s codebase to find bugs, bad practices and security flaws before the app is even run.
Choose SAST if:
- You are still writing or reviewing code
- You want to catch issues early in development
- Developers are actively fixing code and bugs
- You are trying to avoid security issues before they ever reach production
- You believe in shifting security left, starting early rather than fixing later
Best time to use SAST – During development, before deployment.
When to Use DAST
DAST steps when your application is already running. It does not look at your code, but it behaves more like a hacker, poking around to see how your app responds to different inputs or actions.
Choose DAST if:
- Your app is deployed or in a testing/staging environment
- You want to simulate real-world attacks
- You need to test runtime behavior, user sessions, authentication, etc.
- You are focusing on how the app performs under stress or potential threats
Best time to use DAST – During QA, staging or after deployment.
Common Security Challenges Solved by SAST
Let’s look at some of the most common security challenges SAST helps solve:
1. Hardcoded Secrets – Sometimes, developers accidentally leave passwords, API keys or tokens directly in the source code. These can be easily stolen if they are not removed. SAST catches them early before the app ever goes live.
2. SQL Injection Vulnerabilities – Hackers often use SQL injection to access or change data in your app’s database. SAST helps spot unsafe coding patterns that make these attacks possible.
3. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Flaws – XSS allows attackers to inject scripts into your app, which can steal user info or hijack sessions. SAST identifies weak spots where untrusted input isn’t properly handled.
4. Broken Access Control – Apps need rules about who can do what. When those rules aren’t clear or are written poorly, users might access things they should not. SAST checks access logic in code to spot mistakes.
5. Unvalidated Input – If your app does not check the data it receives, it is open to a lot of attacks from injections to logic flaws. SAST helps make sure all inputs are validated and sanitized.
6. Insecure Cryptographic Usage – Using outdated or weak encryption can make your app an easy target. SAST tools flag bad or risky encryption methods used in your code.
7. Poorly Managed Error Handling – Exposing too much information in error messages can give hackers useful clues. SAST helps ensure errors are handled securely without leaking data.
8. Third-Party Library Risks – If your code depends on external libraries, vulnerabilities in those libraries become your problem too. While this leans into Software Composition Analysis (SCA), many SAST tools also alert you to risky dependencies.
Advantages and Disadvantage of SAST
Advantages of SAST
- Identifies security flaws early in the development phase, before the application is deployed
- Scans the entire codebase more efficiently than manual reviews
- Works without executing the program, making it safe and non-disruptive
- Offers real-time feedback and visual reports to help developers understand issues clearly
- Highlights the exact file and line number where problems exist
- Helps improve coding standards and maintain secure development practices
- Supports regulatory compliance by identifying known insecure code patterns
- Allows for automation, enabling continuous security checks during development
Disadvantages of SAST
- Can generate false positives, which require manual verification
- Needs access to the application’s source code, which may not always be feasible
- Does not detect vulnerabilities that appear only during runtime or in specific environments
- Has limited ability to understand third-party libraries, APIs or dynamic code behavior
- Language-specific tools are needed, making it complex for multi-language projects
- Often struggles to analyze function calls with complex or dynamic argument values
- Requires experienced users to configure rules and interpret results effectively
- Can be difficult to scale in very large or complex development environments
Key Steps to Implement SAST Effectively
Using SAST can really boost your app’s security, but only if it is done right. Here are some key steps to help you get the most out of Static Application Security Testing as seen in below image:

1. Understand Your Codebase
Start by identifying all the applications and third-party components that need scanning. A clear picture of the code helps ensure complete and effective security testing.
2. Prepare the Environment
Choose a SAST tool that suits your tech stack. Set it up properly, define what to scan and adjust settings to suit your project’s needs.
3. Automate with CI/CD
Integrate the SAST tool into your CI/CD pipeline so that scans run automatically during builds. This helps catch issues early in development.
4. Run the First Scan
Conduct an initial scan to detect current vulnerabilities. Use this as a reference point for tracking improvements over time.
5. Fix and Follow Up
Review scan results, fix high-priority issues and re-scan to confirm fixes. Keep the process ongoing for better results.
6. Add Custom Rules
If needed, create rules tailored to your codebase or security policies. This improves the detection of specific risks.
7. Track Progress
Use simple metrics like number of issues fixed and scan results over time. Share updates with your team or management.
8. Train Your Team
Ensure developers know how to use the tool and write secure code. This reduces future issues and builds security awareness.
Popular Tools for Static Application Security Testing
There are many tools available to help you run Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Each has its own strengths depending on the programming languages you use, your team size and your budget. Here are some of the popular SAST tools that many developers and security teams rely on:
1. SonarQube – SonarQube is a widely used open-source platform that helps find bugs, code smells and security vulnerabilities in multiple programming languages. It integrates well with CI/CD pipelines and offers detailed reports.
2. Veracode – A cloud-based SAST tool that scans your source code and binaries. Veracode is known for its ease of use and strong support for enterprise environments with compliance features.
3. Checkmarx – Checkmarx is a comprehensive SAST solution that supports many languages and frameworks. It’s popular for its accuracy and integration options, allowing seamless use in agile development.
4. Snyk Code – Part of the Snyk platform, this tool focuses on finding security issues early in the development process and works well with modern DevOps pipelines.
5. Brakeman – Brakeman is an open-source tool specifically designed for Ruby on Rails applications. It quickly finds security issues without requiring the app to run.
6. Semgrep – Semgrep is a fast, lightweight and open-source static analysis tool that works across many languages. It’s great for custom rules and quick scanning.
These tools can help you find and fix vulnerabilities in your code before they reach production, making your software safer for users and your business.
Conclusion
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a powerful way to find security problems early in the software development process. By examining the source code before the application runs, SAST helps developers fix vulnerabilities when it is easier and less costly to do so. While it has some limitations, using SAST alongside other testing methods can greatly improve an application’s security.
Implementing SAST effectively requires the right tools, clear processes, and developer training. When done well, it not only reduces risks but also boosts overall code quality and helps meet compliance standards. For any organization focused on building secure software, SAST is an essential part of the security toolkit.
FAQs
SAST (Static Application Security Testing) analyzes source code without executing it, while DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing) tests applications during runtime to find vulnerabilities.
The purpose of SAST is to identify coding flaws, security issues, and vulnerabilities early in the development process before the application is deployed.
Popular DAST tools include OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, IBM AppScan, Acunetix and Netsparker, which simulate real attacks on running applications.
SAST can involve techniques like pattern matching, data flow analysis, control flow analysis, abstract syntax trees (AST) and formal verification.
Some well-known SAST tools include SonarQube, Checkmarx, Fortify, Veracode and CodeQL.
SAST tools analyze proprietary source code, whereas SCA tools scan open-source dependencies for known vulnerabilities and license compliance issues.
Yes, SAP provides its own Code Vulnerability Analyzer (CVA) for static analysis of ABAP code, helping ensure security within SAP environments.
Absolutely. SAST tools help detect vulnerabilities aligned with OWASP Top 10 and support secure coding practices that aid in GDPR compliance.
Yes, modern SAST tools integrate well with CI/CD pipelines, making them ideal for Agile and DevSecOps workflows.
Most advanced SAST tools support a wide range of languages including Java, C#, JavaScript, Python, PHP and more.
SAST should be run continuously or at key stages like during code check-in or build phases to ensure early detection of issues.
SAST is not typically effective for business logic flaws, which are better identified through manual code review or DAST.
They may produce false positives, require access to source code and struggle with analyzing runtime behavior or third-party components.
Yes, developers often need to interpret results and remediate issues directly in the codebase, making collaboration essential.
Consider factors like language support, integration capabilities, accuracy, compliance needs and scalability when selecting a SAST tool.